data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52254/52254df101a7230d3e53c6aaf8e9466b583357f3" alt=""
Ok, this is the last technical post for the next week where it's more about cameras than the pictures. I've planned to do this for a while but never got round to, so last week at a concert I finally managed to get this started.
The high-ISO comparison this time is only a teaser, this is due to the very slow shutter speeds and moving subjects which make it difficult to compare the cameras properly. All pictures were taken at ISO 1600, f2.5 and a shutter speed of 1/15 so this will account for loss of sharpness or motion blur in some pictures. Anyway, I thought it good to do a quick comparison and see how bothe GRDs perform. I ran Noise Ninja on the GRD I JPG and the GRD II RAW file with the same settings. The in-camera JPG settings were set to Contrast +2, Sharpness +1 and Color Depth -2 on both GRDs.
Hopefully I can do a better comparison soon. This is therefore not a final comparison and the results might be different for the final comparison. Noise Ninja also turned the GRD II file slightly blue so I need to work on that profile.
You can download the files here so you can have a look for yourself.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c6b1/3c6b18e6a4d09542c9e448dc105ebacc729e89a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01c5e/01c5e799b76a89bc9e1bf3bbc68a1da139926354" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/393d4/393d4079db831c15a4e3e9da0ca6ce56fc406895" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3d7f/f3d7f1ee7dabbc4501f260b18e7949309b41760e" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment